Subscribe to Autodesk Civil 3D, civil engineering design software. Buy online or through a reseller. Subscribers get the latest updates and access to prior. Autodesk provides students, educators, and institutions free access to AutoCAD Civil 3D software, in addition to learning tools. Get a free 3-year education. Design and make anything with Autodesk software for Mac. View bestsellers Try, buy, or learn more about Autodesk's mac-compatible products. Software for.
The more I think about this, the more I am inclined to believe that this would be a bad idea. A very bad idea. My experience of Apple products has generally been very positive. Not disputed. Since then, the code base has been spreading its mass of roots deeper and deeper into the Windows soil. Any Windows-specific advantage the developers can take has been taken.
Reversing or working around that process is a very substantial undertaking. If it were done, I think it would have the following outcomes: AutoCAD for Mac would suck The performance is likely to be poor, because all the Windows-specific stuff will have to be redirected, recreated or emulated. The stability is likely to be awful, because this will be new ground for almost all of the developers involved. They would be trying to make significant changes to the code base at the same time that that code base is being modified for the next release.
The bug level is likely to be abysmal, both for the above reasons and also because the number of pre-release testers available to Autodesk on this platform is likely to be relatively tiny. The user interface is likely to be an uncomfortable square-peg-in-round-hole effort, which will work badly and be derided by OS X users. Would this happen again? Yes, I think it probably would. That, of course, makes it much less likely that there would be a second or third release. This policy has unfortunately left large numbers of orphans in its wake over the years.
In the event of poor sales, Mac for AutoCAD users would just be another set of unfortunates to add to a long list. AutoCAD for Mac would be bad for Windows users The very substantial effort required to produce any kind of AutoCAD for Mac at all would be a major drain on very limited and shrinking development resources.
That means Windows users of AutoCAD would look forward to a release or more likely several releases with fewer new features, less completion of existing undercooked features, and longer waits until bugs and other problems get fixed. This, in exchange for no benefit whatsoever to those users. In fact, the decoupling of Windows-specific calls and the likely introduction of extra bugs would probably make AutoCAD for Windows work less well than it otherwise would.
AutoCAD for Mac would be bad for Autodesk Autodesk is currently trying to save money by closing down offices, dropping products, cutting down on expenses and sacking employees some of whom were long-termers; irreplaceable sources of information about use of the product and why certain things were done the way they were. In such an environment, does it make sense to start up a new project with high resource requirements and limited potential benefits?
Especially when it is just a repetition of a previous project that was a complete failure? So, in addition to costing Autodesk a lot of money and harming the quality of its core product, a failed AutoCAD for Mac would leave behind more Autodesk haters and be rather embarrassing. Related Author: His roles have included CAD management, development, consulting and technical writing. He is also an international veteran fencing champion.
For example, AutoCAD Architecture formerly Architectural Desktop permits architectural designers to draw 3D objects, such as walls, doors, and windows, with more intelligent data associated with them rather than simple objects, such as lines and circles. The data can be programmed to represent specific architectural products sold in the construction industry, or extracted into a data file for pricing, materials estimation, and other values related to the objects represented. Additional tools generate standard 2D drawings, such as elevations and sections, from a 3D architectural model. Similarly, Civil Design, Civil Design 3D, and Civil Design Professional support data-specific objects facilitating easy standard civil engineering calculations and representations. Civil 3D was later developed and Land Desktop was retired. It was sold directly by Autodesk and in computer stores unlike the full version of AutoCAD, which must be purchased from official Autodesk dealers.